|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Dierdra Vaal
Veto.
Veto Corp
186
   |
Posted - 2012.08.02 17:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
Two step wrote:Some questions for folks that are reading the minutes:
1) The first session was a straight up transcript. Do you like that format?
2) The other sessions have a lot more direct quotes from people. Do you like this better than the past formats?
I didn't like the transcript format. It's too verbose and cluttered with irrelevant details. I find the 'regular' format much easier to read.
Can you give an example of the the direct quotes you mention? Other than the straight up transcripts I didn't notice much difference from previous minutes.
Veto #205
* * *
Director Emeritus at EVE University
* * *
CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman |
Dierdra Vaal
Veto.
Veto Corp
186
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 18:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
Two step wrote:Dierdra Vaal wrote:Two step wrote:Some questions for folks that are reading the minutes:
1) The first session was a straight up transcript. Do you like that format?
2) The other sessions have a lot more direct quotes from people. Do you like this better than the past formats? I didn't like the transcript format. It's too verbose and cluttered with irrelevant details. I find the 'regular' format much easier to read. Can you give an example of the the direct quotes you mention? Other than the straight up transcripts I didn't notice much difference from previous minutes. In every session but the first one, the style is very different than for past minutes. We tried to include direct quotes, for exmaple, in looking at page 59 (chosen at random), there are a couple of quotes from me and Seleene. I think we also included a lot more detail than in the past, where we would often skip over some of the intermediate discussion and just mention the final conclusions.
I see. Yes those quotes are fine :)
Alright my first questions as I continue to work through it:
Eve Future, specifically about comments made by Seleene and UAxDeath, page 46.
Quote:Seleene [...] pointed out that moons and their resources is a great conflict driver
Quote:UAxDEATH said that [changing T2 requirements creates fights] was not a correct assessment; resources are not as big of a reason for fighting as personal vendetta (or hate).
These two statements seem to be diametrically opposed. Are resources (such as moon goo) reasons to fight over (conflict drivers) or not? (even if the incentive isn't quite as strong as really hating some dude's face?)
Veto #205
* * *
Director Emeritus at EVE University
* * *
CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman |
Dierdra Vaal
Veto.
Veto Corp
186
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 21:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Question 2 while I wait on the answer to my question 1 (page 3 of this thread):
Pages 93-95 Crimewatch
Was there no discussion about the change in sec status hits that was discussed at fanfest (essentially meaning lowsec piracy would no longer lock a pirate out of high sec)? I would love to know if that idea (a great idea!) was scrapped or if it's still going to happen - and if so, when?
Veto #205
* * *
Director Emeritus at EVE University
* * *
CSM1 delegate, CSM3 chairman and CSM5 vice-chairman |
|
|
| |
|